Talk:Performance Monitor

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

I move to combine this stub with another article in wiki called System monitor (note the "monitor" is not capitalized All who ney please discuss Lyskar 23:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Other system monitors are listed separately in that article, Activity Monitor on OS X, for example. The System monitor article should discuss the concept generically, and then have separate articles for the different individual products. -- Dave Braunschweig (talk) 19:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Performance Monitor

The article correctly describes System Monitor being replaced by Performance Monitor. However, the Performance Monitor text was incorrectly linked to Windows Task Manager. I've redirected it to Performance Monitor, but there is currently no such article. -- Dave Braunschweig (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Performance Monitor links and added Performance Monitor content instead. Now, since the current name of this application is Performance Monitor, should this article be renamed? -- Dave Braunschweig (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Microsoft is back to calling it System Monitor in Server 2012. Found at Start System Monitor. I now recommend leaving the article named as is. -- Dave Braunschweig (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's in the SQL server documentation, and probably a fluke. The official name given in Windows docs doesn't appear to have changed [1]. 86.126.31.175 (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]