Talk:Ascension Cathedral (Veliko Tarnovo)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 09:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Article is well written and complies to the requirements for WP:MOS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Article covers all major aspects and is focused.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article complies to WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Pictures are properly tagged and captioned.

7. Overall: This article is a well researched and written. I enjoyed reading it, and am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA so I am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: