Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 581/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Criteria

GA Criteria
GA Criteria: 1 1.a Y 1.b Y 2 2.a Y (All references are either self-contained or have bibliography.) 2.b Y 2.c Y 2.d Y (Highest is 9.9, due to name of source, and incidental phrases.) 3 3.a Y 3.b Y 4 4.a Y 5 5.a Y 6 6.a Y 6.b Y

• No DAB links Y
• No Dead links Y
• Images appropriately licensed Y

Prose Suggestions

• although the beginning has since been lost. Does this mean the beginning was lost before the Papyrus was found? If so, I suggest a change to although the beginning of the papyrus was lost before it was found.
• It is the only of the Oxyrhynchus Papyri presently held in the university's collection suggest It is the only Oxyrhynchus Papyri currently held by the university's collection.
• if not already orphaned or discarded does discarded here mean left to die? If so I would recommend you specify that.
• If this stipulation was transgressed, the typical punishment was confiscation of private property. to what extent? Would the slave be taken? Would a certain value worth of property be taken?
• Financial declaration of slaving sales should this be slave sales, or does source use slaving sales?
• @Curlymanjaro: That is all my comments. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Done; thanks so much for your comments. Curlymanjaro (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)