Talk:Pledge of Allegiance to the Philippine Flag

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Heraldry and vexillology Stub‑class

	Heraldry portal Pledge of Allegiance to the Philippine Flag is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Name of this article

This article's present name, "Panunumpa ng Katapatan sa Watawat", appears to violate Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)#Use English words ("Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. [...] Rationale and specifics: See: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)". -- Boracay Bill (talk) 23:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino vs. Pilipino, etc.

This edit caught my eye. The edit changed "Ako ay Pilipino" to "Ako ay Filipino" and changed "kanyang" to kaniyang" with an edit summary saying, See official "Panunumpa sa Watawat" (Ako ay Filipino...). I have reverted it back into agreement with the cited supporting source (RA8491). As far as I know, that law has not been changed. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation: Revert re the text of the pledge, and the cited supporting source

Here, I have reverted a change to both the text of the pledge and the cited supporting source.

The reverted-to supporting source is www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1996/06/12/executive-order-no-343-s-1996/, a quotation of Executive Order No. 343, s. 1996 by the official gazette of the Philippine government
The reverted-from supporting source is elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/4626, a web page in the e-library of the Supreme Court of the Philippines which appears to be the same with some presentation differences at first glance but which, on closer examination, differs in detail. On closer examination, the following header can be seen above the apparent quotation: No. 630 H. No. 2586 / Malaya 2/19/98 ; Manila Times 2/19/98 ; 9 VLD 2d 353. That appears to identify it as a requote of an article published by the Manila Times on February 19, 1998. I have not been able to locate a copy of that article online.

Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]