Talk:Pan-Illyrian hypotheses

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Illyria

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illyria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illyria and Illyrians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllyriaWikipedia:WikiProject IllyriaTemplate:WikiProject IllyriaIllyria articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 14 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Pan-Illyrian theories to Pan-Illyrian hypotheses. The result of the discussion was moved.

other versions

The "other versions" section lacks references. I know Bonfantes views in e.g "The origins of the Palestinoi" etc but I am not sure about Georgiev using the term "Pelasg". Generally, I suspect that the English of his supposed comment is not from Georgiev himself. Can someone check this and put a reference? Fkitselis (talk) 14:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that Aigest has added a reference to what Georgiev has said, but this should be temporary. We need the real reference on Georgiev's work in order to be correct. I have seen in the past people commenting others work and giving false views on what they actually wrote. Not to mention cases when wannabe academics put quotes never mentioned by anyone. In any case, thank you Aigest. If you can find the primary source for the comment then we should consider that section complete. Fkitselis (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you have acted meanwhile, so I should thank you on that. Nice;) Aigest (talk) 10:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) Fkitselis (talk) 13:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad source

There's a short citation in the form <ref>{{harvp|Skënder|Korkuti|1969}}.</ref> but there is no such corresponding full source citation anywhere in the article. Either it was wrongly removed, or the short citation was copy-pasted from some article without the full citation to go along with it, or it's just noise someone injected as a prank. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost (talk) 11:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pan-Illyrian theories → Pan-Illyrian hypotheses – Misnomer. "Theory" and "hypothesis" are not synonyms in fields like this, and none of these hypotheses rose to the level of theories before being discarded. Also, to be WP:CONSISTENT with other articles of this sort, e.g. Vasconic substrate hypothesis, Germanic substrate hypothesis, etc. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 12:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Languages and WikiProject Illyria have been notified of this discussion. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Most of the sources are not in English, which makes a "follow the sources" argument difficult. Other abandoned linguistics hypotheses are titled as such, this one should be as well. Walsh90210 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.