Talk:P-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 23:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
7. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

8. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• No disambiguation links on P class cruiser.
• External links check ok - just a question over is Navweaps a reliable source.
• Reference format you have Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press and Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press I have no preference but they should be the same for consistancy.
• Garzke has both an ISBN and a OCLC number while the others only have an ISBN number
• Citation #6 is written as Garzke and Dulin (1985), pp. 351–352 its the only one that includes the year of publication.
• Almost all the measurements are metric/imperial apart from some in the inf box which are the other way around 33 knots (61 km/h) maximum - Range: 25,000 nautical miles (46,000 km) at 13 knots (24 km/h) and 15,000 nautical miles (28,000 km) at 19 knots (35 km/h). It would be more consistant to have them all the same way.

Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

• • The ref issues should all be fixed - for navweaps see my comment at the D-class review. As for units, knots and nautical miles are the standard units across the board - nobody measures distance at sea in kilometers or the speed of ships in km/h. Germany uses metric for everything else, however, to it would be wrong to talk about 5.9 inch rather than 15 centimeter guns. Parsecboy (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

OK passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 00:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)