Talk:Oxyuris

Animals Low‑importance

Oxyuris is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

On 25 October 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Oxyuris (nematode) to Oxyuris. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 25 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oxyuris (nematode) → Oxyuris – Oxyuris currently redirects to Pinworm (parasite). That was probably done because the human pinworm was originally placed in this genus, but I don't think that makes the human pinworm the primary topic. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Term not mentioned at current redirect target (except in hatnote), so no reason why the current genus shouldn't occupy the base name. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: per nom. YorkshireExpat (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.