Talk:XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

On 27 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle to XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 27 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. I'm going to boldly move this. (closed by non-admin page mover) Schierbecker (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle → XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle – As the initial design phase of the programme has been completed the Army has officially redesignated the programme from Optonally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) to XM30 Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle. I'm not quite sure on the process of renaming/moving pages when development programmes are redesignated but thought it would be worth a discussion. Brandon Downes (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - It'd be helpful if you could provide a source or two for this, especially since it's apparently not mentioned in the article yet. BilCat (talk) 00:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Agh apologies I forgot. ^[1] ^[2] Also my apologies if this is the incorrect way of mentioning sources on a talk page I never really mess with them and still havent got the hang of it. Brandon Downes (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Thanks, and you did fine. BilCat (talk) 00:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References

[1] ttps://www.army.mil/article/267920/army_announces_contract_awards_for_omfv

[2] ttps://breakingdefense.com/2023/06/omfv-race-narrows-rheinmetall-gdls-again-square-off-for-bradley-replacement-competition/

[1]

[2]