Talk:Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 14 days

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Section sizes

Section size for Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries (31 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	1,274	1,274
Background	5,161	5,161
Polling aggregation	914	914
2020	185	61,766
April–August 2020	13,202	13,202
March 2020	13,809	13,809
February 2020	18,000	18,000
January 2020	16,570	16,570
2019	185	165,177
December 2019	15,959	15,959
November 2019	13,746	13,746
October 2019	20,862	20,862
September 2019	20,109	20,109
August 2019	18,812	18,812
July 2019	18,306	18,306
April–June 2019	38,061	38,061
March 2019	8,905	8,905
January–February 2019	10,232	10,232
Before 2019	19	10,001
October–December 2018	2,942	2,942
Before October 2018	7,040	7,040
Polls including Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama	12,965	12,965
Head-to-head polls	17,728	17,728
Favorability ratings	511	102,806
From February 2020 to April 2020	11,828	11,828
From October 2019 to January 2020	29,150	29,150
Before October 2019	61,317	61,317
See also	480	480
Notes	114	114
References	28	28
External links	642	642
Total	379,056	379,056

Tulsi

Big thanks to the people who contributed to the graph near the top of the page, but don't you guys think we should include the data for Tusli? I know she scores low, but the fact that she is one of only 3 people still in the race, has to count for something, right? Nate Hooper (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. With only three candidates in the race, it makes sense that her polling average should be in the graph. --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 15:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’s Tulsi, and not Tusli, though, by the way :) --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 15:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done (using data from Melencron's graph up to July, and polling aggregates from then on). Others line still needs to be updated. Chessrat ^{(talk, contributions)} 14:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subsamples and Favourability

Certain polls like YouGov/Economist regularly put out questions for candidate favourability and then have democratic primary subsamples we could theoretically use. I tend to be a bit hesitant about using these in general unless there is a large subsample (say, n=1000+), respected trackers like 538 use them, or if their use is already agreed for the page in question. However, not many aggregates besides wikipedia are tracking favourability anyway, and we appear to have started using subsamples.

Is this ok? If not, I will remove the Fox News favourability rating. If nobody minds, I'll get around to adding some of these subsamples in the days to come.

—PutItOnAMap (talk) 4:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Archiving

Is there a reason why only 10% of the links have Internet Archive mirrors attatched to them? I see the Archive Bot has been active here a number of times, so why don't all links have the webarchive template? Having a bunch of raw pdfs, some linked via Google Drive in here seems odd. (I assume the URLs all probably are already in the Archive, but not linked here. Would converting the raw URLs to normal references work better?) jonas (talk) 07:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]