This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
The book by Bell is a good read, but it isn't a serious history book as it relies on interviews and hardly at all on documents. Bell was enamoured by the Irgun in particular and was happy to present their claims as factual. This article needs to be rewritten using better sources. Zerotalk07:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would say the same thing about the "testimony" of Yoseph Nachmias about the number of those killed by snipers. Not only is he highly biased, but it would be difficult for him to actually know the number. And a nice round number it is, too. Mcdruid (talk) 03:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And now that I think about it, 1000 in five months is more than 6 per day: if it were anywhere near that, there would be other reports. Mcdruid (talk) 03:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The source says "killed or wounded", not "killed", which makes it slightly more plausible but not much. Also he was an Irgun company commander, not a regular. Things like this should come from historians, not partisans with a conflict of interest. I'm deleting it. Zerotalk05:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've gone through five or six sources and none of them talk about this level of violence. Until they started shooting mortars at each other. Also all of the sources indicated that the violence was mutual, at worst. Mcdruid (talk) 06:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An excellent source for this article is the paper by Itamar Radai here. Radai also has a book with much the same information. It is way more detailed, balanced and scholarly than most of the sources currently used. Zerotalk06:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
