	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (290)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,046)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,463) • Stub-Class articles (6,712)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,342)

Goof not a goof...

Untitled

The article lists the spinnign dog tag as not having the correct numbers (and being read out whilst spinning) as being a goof. Yet surely that was the whole point of the scene (note: I've not seen it in a few years)... ie, that the 'real' number is only revealed as an illusion generated by spinning the tag... ie, what described is not a goof, but the whole point of the scene? --Nemo 00:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It wasn't a "goof", nor was it particularly notable (in comparison with things like the wind tunnel, the zorb escape etc) and wouldn't have enhanced the article even if it had been accurate. And anyway a "Goofs" section isn't really appropriate for an encylopaedia. As such I removed it. Gram123 14:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Audio Versions

There are two different english audio versions of this great and excellent movie. The first english dub is the excellent cheesy one and the second is a newer english dub which is more boring. If anyone has any excact information on this, it would be nice to update the article with it. b0ef November 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 10:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

zorb ball

In another article sphereing, the company Zorb has been editing around the article to look like an ad for the sphere product. I think that might have been done here as well, particularly since the movie predates the company (as pointed out several times in the discussion there). Sorry to bring up this minor point up, but I think this should be addressed.

69.120.31.34 (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the article has been edited to make it look like product advertising. The edit in question was made way back in Jan 2006. I think it is just a case of someone assuming that "zorb" is a generic name, rather than a brand name, like calling a vacuum cleaner a "hoover". I've edited the article so it now says "zorb-like sphere", if that's an acceptable compromise. Gram123 (talk) 11:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]