Talk:Operation Concrete

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Release

Is there any confirmation on when this film was released specifically? Some say 1955, some say 1958, does anyone or any source refer to a specific context of release (festival, before a feature-length film, etc.)? YouCanDoBetter (talk) 23:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk 13:55, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Jean-Luc Godard credited neither his writer nor assistant on his first short film?

Source: Brody, Richard (2008). Everything Is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard (1. ed ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books, p. 33. ISBN 978-0-8050-6886-3.

ALT1: ... that while shooting his first short film, Jean-Luc Godard was barred from his mother's funeral for stealing? Source: Brody, Richard (2008). Everything Is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard (1. ed ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books, p. 33. ISBN 978-0-8050-6886-3.
Reviewed:

5x expanded by Lbal (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Lbal (talk) 23:49, 30 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Starting review. Updates to follow. Ktin (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria. No issues with tone. Referencing seems alright, but, is sourced to offline sources. I will AGF on those offline sources. Assuming AGF on plagiarism checks as well. No QPQ needed.

Both hooks are interesting. However, to validate both of the hooks, please can I get the relevant sections from the offline sources quoted here? Ktin (talk) 05:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ktin Hi, sorry if my reply is not properly formatted, I'm still working on learning some aspects of Wikipedia. I've linked a Google Books copy of the source at the bottom of the page itself in the Works Cited section, but it is also at this link as well: https://books.google.com/books?id=Nf_uKU6bYRYC&pg=PA25&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbal (talk • contribs) 19:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem on the formatting. Let me take a look at the Google Books preview. Ktin (talk) 01:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Validated both hooks using p33 of the Google Books Preview. Good to go. Ktin (talk) 01:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]