Talk:Ooh Boy

Requested move 10 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The consensus is that, as the only notable song of this title, it is the primary topic and should therefore be moved to the base location. Jenks24 (talk) 16:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh Boy (song) → ? – "Song" isn't suitable disambiguation as the other topic is also a song - this is primary topic or it needs additional disambiguation. Peter James (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 16:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question What is the other song that you are referring to? Blueboar (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ooh Boy (1977 song) -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to: Ooh Boy (Rose Royce song) 10:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by In ictu oculi (talk • contribs)
Move to Ooh Boy -- As the other song listed on the disambiguation page is non-notable, disambiguation is not required. A hat note would be sufficient--Yaksar (let's chat) 11:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then we have to have a hat note on the Rose Royce song to the Oh Boy dab to everyone who can't remember how many o to use in Oh Boy. The absolute majority subject of "Ooh Boy" is not a song. 07:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by In ictu oculi (talk • contribs)

Support Ooh Boy and use a hatnote, per Yaksar. See also WP:TWODABS. The hatnote could also include "Oh Boy". --BDD (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, agree with Yaksar The only other item listed on the provided disambiguation page is non-notable and doesn't have its own Wikipedia article. I think disambiguation is not needed according to criteria at WP:D. This should be listed at AfD. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 02:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.