Talk:Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:52, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Operational"?

The article states that Number 1 reactor has been shut down since since 2006, presumably permanently, but the information box still lists it as "operational". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.78.110 (talk) 01:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to http://m.ibtimes.com/japan-s-nuclear-and-industrial-safety-agency-fukushima-reactors-onagawa-nuclear-power-station-onagaw-134183.html , all three units of Onagawa NPP were online when the earthquake of 11 March 2011 struck and shut down because of it. Q43 (talk) 02:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I was making rumblings about getting this picture available for use here. Does anyone out there have experience with this kind of thing? -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh!

Ze Germans have nearly completed zheir articles on zese! -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "guardian2011-03-11":

From List of civilian nuclear incidents: McCurry, Justin (11 March 2011). "Japan Declares 'Nuclear Emergency' after Quake". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 March 2011.
From 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami: McCurry, Justin (11 March 2011). "Japan Declares 'Nuclear Emergency' after Quake". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 12 March 2011. Retrieved 11 March 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

Reference named "nei-20110311":

From 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami: "Japan initiates emergency protocol after earthquake". Nuclear Engineering International. 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 18 April 2011. Retrieved 11 March 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
From Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Plant: "Japan initiates emergency protocol after earthquake". Nuclear Engineering International. March 11, 2011. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
From List of civilian nuclear incidents: "Japan initiates emergency protocol after earthquake". Nuclear Engineering International. 11 March 2011. Retrieved 11 March 2011.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]