Talk:Omnibus Law on Job Creation

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Mid‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Omnibus Law bill is declared “Conditionally Inconstitutional” by the Constitutional Court, the House of Representatives (DPR) haven’t yet amend the Omnibus Law to fix it yet.

The House of Representatives have not yet amend the Omnibus Law. The UU PPP revision was passed by the House in an effort to revise the the Omnibus Law act but the House have not yet made any effort to correct or to amend the Omnibus Law Act yet. In November 2023, if the DPR have not yet amend or correct the Omnibus Law further. The Omnibus Law Act will be declared void, no longer used. Therefore, the revision of the UU PPP does not need to be mentioned here yet. https://amp.kompas.com/nasional/read/2022/05/24/15405781/revisi-uu-ppp-sudah-disahkan-dpr-siap-revisi-uu-cipta-kerja https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/149750/uu-no-11-tahun-2020 Eustatius Strijder (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Eustatius Strijder, thanks for the explanation. Until a consensus is reached on the topic, however, please do not revert on the article. I'm not entirely clear on what you're saying. Even if the HoR hasn't amended the law yet, why shouldn't the Bill of Law Formulation and the Law on Law Formulation not be mentioned in the article? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]