Talk:Plough Lane (1912–1998)

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image of Plough Lane

Some Dons fan needs to post an image of Plough Lane, i reckon.

--Whohe! (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New article for New Plough Lane development

I will suggest the creation of an article of it's own for the development of the new stadium.

Just like we do with other developments, which are so long into their proposed planning.

I dont think the new content which is now on Plough Lane and Wimbledon (Greyhound) Stadium, belongs to those articles. It only makes confusion in fx the infoboxes, when people add info on the new development, mixed with the current.

At last - I dont know where to put such a proposal other than this - do tell me if there is a suggestion and discussion page for new articles. I dont wanna start it myself, if the majority is not behind the idea.

--Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Plough Lane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Plough Lane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Plough Lane articles

Would make the most sense to call the new ground "Plough Lane" and the old "Old Plough Lane", as I see it. I have never really seen people call the new ground "New Plough Lane".

Requested move 12 March 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page to Plough Lane (1912–98). A separate discussion can be opened to bring this and similar titles into line with MOS:DATERANGE. (non-admin closure) Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Old Plough Lane → ? – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 06:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest Plough Lane (1912–98) in line with Celtic Park (1888–92), Hampden Park (1873–83), Ibrox Park (1887–99) etc. Number 57 14:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. That does look better for a wiki article. Thanks. And then call the new ground Plough Lane. Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Before a move happens, is it even certain that disambiguation is needed? The new stadium is at New Plough Lane, leaving Plough Lane available. Is the new ground actually called "New Plough Lane", or is this another case of poor naming? Number 57 15:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - The common name for the new ground is "Plough Lane". And it is what people will call it, based on what I have heard and seen. But I dont think I, as a common user on Wiki, can move the page to the "Plough Lane" article page myself? That is why I try to get it done here. Sine Cera, Infobesity (talk) 19:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most "common users" have the right to move pages over redirects that don't have an edit history. But Plough Lane does. For the new stadium to move over it, you need to show that it is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. If neither the new nor old stadium is primary topic, we need a disambiguation page at "Plough Lane" per WP:NOPRIMARY (with Plough Lane (disambiguation) redirecting to it). 94.21.219.87 (talk) 03:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 20:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Plough Lane (1912–98) per N57. GiantSnowman 20:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. Move to Plough Lane (1912–98). -- MLD · T · C · @: 16:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If moved, should be to Plough Lane (1912–1998) per WP:DATERANGE. The others should be moved too. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:New Plough Lane which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]