Talk:British Columbia Energy Regulator

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Request assistance with updated court case ruling

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

On Oct. 10, 2014, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled: "I conclude that the interpretation that successive or recurrent approvals may be granted is reasonable and, in any event, correct. The petition is dismissed." ^[1]

^ "Western Canada Wilderness Committee v. British Columbia (Oil and Gas Commission), 2014 BCSC 1919". Retrieved 22 January 2015.

Wrightwords (talk) 23:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Not clear what it is you want doing here. Please provide in a Change X to Y format. Amortias (T)(C) 22:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I already inserted the Supreme Court ruling in this edit, Amortias. I also asked Wrightwords for a photo we can use for the page, but no reply...--Wuerzele (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Western Canada Wilderness Committee v. British Columbia (Oil and Gas Commission), 2014 BCSC 1919". Retrieved 22 January 2015.

[1]