This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It's not clear what part of MOS:AT you are actually referring to, but while the sources all describe this as an "incident" they also make multiple mentions of the vehicle and passengers being shot. I would argue that WP:CRITERIA support this move, specifically on the basis of recognizability, naturalness, and precision.Polyamorph (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I genuinely do not remember why I used MOS:AT instead of just WP:AT, as that's probably what I meant. Either way I disagree on recognizability and precision, though I agree "shooting" would be a more natural title.
Also, unrelated to this specific page move, why is the article titled with the city being called Nushki? When looking at the sources and other articles on this, many seem to refer to it as Noshki instead of Nushki, however both Noshki and Noshki District redirect to the other spelling. Is Nushki a more correct spelling, or is it just the anglicized version? SmittenGalaxy|talk!02:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
SmittenGalaxy, first off.. edit conflict on the closure. I guess we were on the talk page at the same time. 😂 Second, on the district name in the article title here, the simplest explanation is that the location is currently at Nushki District. If you think there is a need to change name of the district to a more common name one, go ahead and move the district article (or open a discussion if you require more inputs first) and then come back and move this article accordingly. This RM closure should not restrict such a move. – robertsky (talk) 03:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw the closure literally a minute or two after posting my reply lol, didn't expect to see it pop up
But like I said, there seems to be conflicting information on the name of the area. On the map, it's Noshki, as well as in many articles. But there's also some that say Nushki, which leads me to believe it's an anglicization of the original name. One of the sources used in this article alone even uses "Noshaki", so I'll open an RM on the Nushki District article to get an idea of what the official agreed upon name is and come back if necessary. SmittenGalaxy|talk!05:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]