Talk:Nucleus basalis

Anatomy: Neuroanatomy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to neuroanatomy.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unreliable source

Why is Robert Twigger's comments about function taken as truth? He has no training in neurology or neuroscience.

Thanks for your observations. Wikipedia's an encyclopedia that anyone can contribute to, if you feel this statement is unreliable (and I agree with you that it is), please feel free to remove it. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved Primefac (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nucleus basalis of Meynert → Nucleus basalis – TA preferred name, avoids use of eponym, easier and much more widely used Google search and ngrams Iztwoz (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Nucleus basalis is now more common and in this case makes perfect sense.Gcastellanos (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above proposal. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.