This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
"it was Nothhelm that gathered materials" - Nothhelm that, or Nothhelm who?
"was an Anglo-Saxon Archbishop of Canterbury in medieval England" - seems a bit extraneous. Just "A medieval English Archbishop of Canterbury"?
"After his death he was considered a saint." - considered a saint, or was he actually sent through the whole kit and kaboodle of the catholic church? if the latter, note it - if the former, add "although he was never.." etc.
Link "pallium"
"He held a synod in 736 or 737, which drew nine bishops. It also adjudicated a dispute over the ownership of a monastery located at Withington" - "He held a synod in 736 or 737, which drew nine bishops and adjudicated a dispute over the ownership of a monastery located at Withington".
"but yet the synod still rendered judgement in the ownership without secular oversight" - clarify?
I've dealt with all of the above, except for the "considered a saint" part. He predates the "formal" procedures - so I've linked to canonization, but the correct term is indeed "considered a saint", as he never went through a formal process, but is still carried on the various lists as a saint. Ealdgyth - Talk12:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]