Jump to content

Talk:Norddeutscher Lloyd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Comments

[edit]

This entire article needs to be rewritten in proper English, with sentences that make sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.52.108.165 (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is still a mess and still needs to be re-written in proper, understandable English. RASAM (talk) 20:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big chunks are still unintelligible. is this article translated from German? The original might clear up some of the obvious points. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.138 (talk) 08:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is still a mess. It does appear to have been simply translated automatically from the German article using Google Translate or similar, which does not always work well with literary German. I have cleaned up the first couple of paragraphs by making reference to the original German (which has, of course, since been edited), but it is slow work and I may not have time to finish this, at least in the near future. It should be noted that when translating articles from other languages in Wikipedia, the article should be tagged on the talk page / discussion page with the "translated" category, so that the original authors are given credit .--Muchado (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now done, though the table of ships and the list of people could do with checking; and although references have been added, many are of poor quality and the article badly needs the addition of better ones. The translation tag had already been added here. Yngvadottir (talk) 06:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1978?

[edit]

There's a line in here that reads "In 1867-1868, NDL began a partnership with the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, which initiated the Baltimore Line; until 1978, this had its own ships." There's no citation, and that seems unlikely since that railroad was defunct by 1978. Should that perhaps be 1878, or does anyone have a source saying 1978 is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.167.26.113 (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd tend to think 1878, too, & a simple transcription error, but I don't have a source. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Norddeutscher Lloyd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Norddeutscher_Lloyd&oldid=1213142067"