Talk:Nono, Córdoba

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Nono, Córdoba, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nono, Córdoba, Argentina → Nono, Córdoba – Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Argentina. Cambalachero (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Avoid unusual double disambiguation. Kauffner (talk) 02:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:How2title... 1-it is a named entity with one obvious name... Nono, -Nono has other uses, 4-this is not the primary topic for Nono, 6-use the Principal Naming Criteria to decide:

Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.

Naturalness – The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English.

Precision – The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects. (See § Precision and disambiguation, below.)

Concision – The title is not longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects. (See § Concision, below.)

Consistency – The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles. Many of these patterns are listed (and linked) as topic-specific naming conventions on article titles, in the box above. (See § Consistency, below.)

It's a draw on recognizability, but the proposed title beats the current title on naturalness, precision (current title is 'overly precise), conciseness, and consistency. --Born2cycle (talk) 02:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. As B2C says, the proposed title is more natural, precise, concise and consistent. This could probably have been listed as an uncontroversial move. Jenks24 (talk) 09:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the precision criterion of the Principal Naming Criteria. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.