Talk:Bare-faced bulbul

A fact from Bare-faced bulbul appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Bare-faced Bulbul, the only songbird in Asia to lack feathers on the face, is the first Asian bulbul to be described in over 100 years?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/August.

Wikipedia

Birds Low‑importance

Bare-faced bulbul is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Scientific name

The order and family shouldn't be identical to the genus and species. I think the source made a mistake. But until I get better info, that's what I put in the taxobox. Grundle2600 (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the genus and species. The source is almost certainly wrong. When better info is found, it can be added. Grundle2600 (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The official name is Pycnonotus hualon. Source Grundle2600 (talk) 05:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Unfortunate that the mistake in a single reference has multiplied and also was featured in the DYK. Especially considering that the text in the article itself was corrected almost a week before the DYK, and that the primary source, the actual description of the species, specifically mentioned that it was not the only with a bare face. 212.10.93.167 (talk) 17:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bare-faced bulbul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226205349/http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/25/WoxvoldDuckworthTimmins-Bulbul.pdf to http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/25/WoxvoldDuckworthTimmins-Bulbul.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We should update the genus

a new genus is for this species, sister to hemixos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.91.210.184 (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]