Talk:No Refunds (film)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, disambiguation page created instead to aid navigation. No consensus on any primary topic. Taelus (Talk) 22:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Refunds (DVD) → No Refunds — No need for a parenthetical clarifier since there is no topic of the same name. 83.135.97.235 (talk) 06:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A page plain No Refunds should better be redirected to a page about practices of not refunding money where some would say that it should be refunded. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, sure, ok... not something I'd have thought of, but it makes sense I guess. What struck me as a gross departure from the MoS was simply the existence of a page name with a custom parenthetical without the main topic even existing as a page, be it as an article, dab or even a redirect. Feel free to create it as a redir if you can find a plausible target (which would then be complemented by a {{Redirect}} hatnote in the target article).

There is also e.g. No Refunds Theatre Company, so a dab might be in order as well. Or yet another idea, we could redirect No refunds to Refund and turn the latter into a dab (it currently redirects to Money back guarantee).

At any rate, I'm not hellbent on moving the page. Please let me know what you think or just go ahead and do it. --83.135.115.62 (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Anthony, and dab per nominator's discovery of yet a third meaning. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 06:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input, but this is really in no way a poll, just a friendly discussion. Also, there is no "third" meaning, just a second topic that contains the phrase "no refund" and may serve to justify another solution than the move I initially proposed. --83.135.94.21 (talk) 06:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an official requested move, and I have posted an opinion exactly as is posted in such discussions. As for three topics, there's the current article, the article you pointed out, and the meaning that Anthony pointed out. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find this entire "support/oppose" lingo a bit tiresome and ineffective. Whatever. Anthony did not point out any specific meaning. --83.135.109.193 (talk) 02:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like to process, go to WP:VP and get it changed. Anthony's meaning is at Returning - where "no refund" and "store credit for return", "restocking fee" and other things are explained. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 05:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like amicable discussion, not the black and white SUPPORT/OPPOSE thing people like you are doing. Are you done with this yet? Then let's get back to the discussion at hand. Thank you. --83.135.100.107 (talk) 07:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No refunds now points to No Refunds, which I have made into a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.