Talk:Nick & Norah's Infinite Playlist/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC) This article is very well written, developed, and sourced. I had only a few minor concerns as I read through it:[reply]

Lead

"Written by Lorene Scafaria, based on the novel of the same name" -> "and based on the novel..."
"in October-December 2007" -> "from October to December 2007"
"September 23, 2008" - comma after 2008

Plot

"Manhattan's Lower East Side" - comma after Side
"Tal starts a fight with Nick" - comma after Nick
"share a kiss" - a little repetitive after they "share a smile" in the previous sentence. Would just "they kiss on the escalator" work?

Cast

"Dennings was the second actor to be cast after Cera" - was she the second cast overall, or the second person cast after Cera (ie. the third overall)?
The link at the end of Rafi Gavron's description has changed. Updating it with the new url (to which it currently redirects) would be good.

Writing

"Rachel Cohn and David Levithan" - comma after Levithan

Filming

"and Williamsburg, Brooklyn" - would probably read better as "as well as Williamsburg, Brooklyn"

Theatrical release

"US$11,311,751 from 2,421" - 2,421 what?

Soundtrack

"he would email songs" - would read better (and maintain verb tense) as "he emailed songs"

Aside from that, the references, fair use rationale, stability, neutrality, and all the rest is just fine. I'll place the article on hold for a week or so. It's just a few minor fixes, but let me know if you need more time because of Christmas. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy review! I think I've addressed all of your concerns. —97198 (talk) 00:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm satisfied that this meets the GA criteria, so I am promoting the article. Thanks for the quick response. You've done an amazing job with this article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, —97198 (talk) 02:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]