Talk:Nguyễn Văn Nhung/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Reviewed previous ACR and FAC describing concerns about lack of background info on the man but satisfied that this meets all GA criteria without need of further work. Prose is highly polished, tone is neutral, citations/refs are excellent and supporting materials look good - a fine piece of work, well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)