Talk:Nguyễn Hợp Đoàn

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fluff

This is nothing short of a fluff piece here. Use a sandbox until the article can site some proper sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.78.183.102 (talk) 15:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blatantly POV / Missing references

Whoever lifted and wrote the article used unabashed POV language. I've erased sections that painted the figure overtly.192.206.151.130 (talk) 21:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Why are the external links about subjects other than the subject of this article? Badagnani (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

340th Division??

Is that a typo for the 304th ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terry J. Carter (talk • contribs) 23:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nguyễn Hợp Đoàn/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Initial Comment ==

I'd classify this article as a "Start". While it provides good information, the tone at times (especially towards the latter part of the article) sounds biased, painting an overly-rosy picture of the man (the insertion of adjectives like "sadly", in reference to his inability to return to Vietnam, seem especially overt).

I don't know enough about the man to change the article myself. I just thought I'd open it up for discussion.

-76.188.201.188 01:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 21:54, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nguyễn Hợp Đoàn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070810110529/http://www-cgsc.army.mil/ to http://www-cgsc.army.mil/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

War flag of South Vietnam.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]