Talk:Newark–World Trade Center

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:PATH NWK-WTC.

Merge discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I'm officially advocating the merge of Park Place – Hudson Terminal to this article. The former Hudson and Manhattan Railroad service is a predecessor to this one. However, I don't want any material from the PP-HT article lost in the process. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The Park Place – Hudson Terminal article is too short to survive alone. Vcohen (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clear support as this is the direct continuation of the old service name. Same route, really, except for maybe the Newark end from before Newark Penn. The other article is so stubby, there's really nothing to loose. oknazevad (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Why hasn't anyone informed the original creator of the article about this merger? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I did it. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hate to say it, Dan, but as the one proposing the merger it was kinda your responsibility. oknazevad (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so now that I have, why hasn't it turned up in any article alerts? I thought things like this were automatic. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think merge discussions do, unlike AfDs, formal RMs or such. I think that's because there's no cetralized discussion area for these, unlike WP:AFD or WP:RM. I do know that merge tags can stay on an article for years if there's no one watching. I've seen them. oknazevad (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, an anonymous IP merged the two articles, so I'm closing this discussion now. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.