Talk:State Highway 30 (New Zealand)/GA1

GA Review

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   I would look into some more blue links and an overall copyedit.

   B. MoS compliance:

   This article has some bad choices of headers. Most articles, even outside the U.S. follow USRD structure.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   This article is poorly referenced. There is 1 citation in the entire article and I really doubt this will pass with just one citation.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   See above.

   C. No original research:

   See above.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   For 136 miles, this can definitely have a longer "route" section. Try to look at some of the USRD featured articles for an example of what a good route description should look like.

   B. Focused:

   See above.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   There is not one image in the article, instead all it has is just the 2 shields for 30 and 30A. Definitely an image of the highway or a map of the road would be helpful.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This article has a long way to go before being ready for GAN. For now, I have failed this article because it does not meet most criteria. Good luck. ^Mitch32^contribs 20:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)