Talk:New Ulm, Minnesota

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Panoramic View photo

This photo is not particularly descriptive, especially in thumbnail version: its main features are a lightpost and a curb and gutter. Can it be replaced with something more notable? I'd offer a replacement, but I'm 2500 miles away. Dpmath (talk) 06:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced it with a cropped version to at least get rid of the post and curb. If someone from there wants to take a nice picture of downtown and put in that spot, that would be great, but I do'nt live in the area either.Iulus Ascanius (talk) 09:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Festivals

I found the events from the city's web site under the "About Our City" section which only listed Oktoberfest and Fasching. The city's events page then listed the Bock Fest at the same time as the Fasching. I couldn't find much more about the Fasching event so I did not include anything about it at this time, but I had been aware about the other two events and found their official web sites for more information about when they were founded. Giesey (talk) 01:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More photos

From the National Archives:

Kaldari (talk) 21:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of New Ulm at Commons!

Lots more photos available, need categories. (BTW, checking "Cat-a-Lot" in your preferences makes categorization faster.)

http://http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:National_Archives_and_Records_Administration/Categorize/US_National_Archives_series:_DOCUMERICA:_The_Environmental_Protection_Agency%27s_Program_to_Photographically_Document_Subjects_of_Environmental_Concern,_compiled_1972_-_1977 Djembayz (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Ulm, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208080845/http://www.internationalpolka.com/loeffelmacher.htm to http://www.internationalpolka.com/loeffelmacher.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on New Ulm, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]