Talk:NJFX

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 15 July 2017 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Creating talk page for discussion. Article has been flagged as being too promotional but I'm unsure what is promotional, so will see what needs to be cut out to pass review. I've contacted the nominating editor for information.Timtempleton (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a few items and resubmitted. Timtempleton (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest WP:ADMASQ. Replicates the usual style of WP:PAID, particularly re. list of services, hence why it's high on editors' lists. Cheers, — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 15:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the direct. I certainly don't want the article to be too promotional, and indeed I spend a lot of time taking spam and promotional info out of other articles. I did notice that Wikipedia is weak on data center and subsea cable info, and since millions of users are impacted with these facilities, this addresses that. How would you recommend I include this facility info without saying what it actually does? Tough line to straddle. I did take a few things out from my original article, but everything that was and is there comes from 3rd party media coverage - there are no weasel words and this isn't a personal essay. Timtempleton (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]