Talk:Networking and Information Technology Research and Development

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... this page explains the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program, which is a Government Program to advance IT R&D in the United States. This article is not promoting a product or advertising goods, it is simply providing information about a Government Program in hopes that it will provide researchers and scientists, and the general public better information about the IT R&D activities within Government Agencies--Nitrd (talk) 21:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's written like something you'd find on the home page of the organization's own website. That's a no-no in Wikipedia, even for non-profit charities and government organizations. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I am using my real username here. this page explains the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program, which is a Government Program to advance IT R&D in the United States. This article is not promoting a product or advertising goods, it is simply providing information about a Government Program in hopes that it will provide researchers and scientists, and the general public better information about the IT R&D activities within Government Agencies--Baranyad (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it is still quite promotional, quoting its own virtues. And it needs much work to use normal English instead of being in the acronymic language of its members. For that matter, need sto clarify it is part of the United States government! This is not the US encyclopedia. W Nowicki (talk) 21:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copy/Paste of Existing Document

The bulk of this article (Sections 1-6) has been duplicated—word-for-word—from pages 1-11 of http://www.nitrd.gov/PUBS/2013supplement/FY13NITRDSupplement.pdf (The Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program - Supplement to the President’s Budget FY 2013).

I understand this isn't a copyright violation as it's US government material, but does WP really need to mirror this doc? Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. If the information is found on the agency's own website, then there's no need for Wikipedia to reproduce it verbatim, don't you think? -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, needs to be paraphrased into normal English in neutral language, and not use dated terms. W Nowicki (talk) 21:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]