Talk:Nemesis (Christie novel)/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Nemesis (Christie novel). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
What could possibly be the point of listing the entire cast of the Hickson adaptation, especially given that half of them seem to have played "Member of Coach Party"? I'm going to remove the cast list. Binabik80 01:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm putting some of the items back. I see your point about the coach party and will remove those people but the rest is info of interest and you are making this one Christie page different to the rest that I have and am continuing to update--Jtomlin1uk 10:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Nem7484.jpg
Image:Nem7484.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Plot summary is confusing
The plot summary is very confusing. It doesn't make clear that Michael has been imprisoned for murder; nor who the victim of that murder is. (I assume, reading between the lines, that it's Nora Broad?) Moreover, Joanna Crawford and Emlyn Price are mentioned without any prior introduction. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 07:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Seems very straightforward to me. Crawford and Price are mentioned as a distraction while talking with the three sisters, because Miss Marple knows those two did not set the boulder rolling to Miss Temple, eventually murdering her. Miss Marple needs one of the sisters to confess, before the same sister kills Miss Marple, as Clotilde tries twice. Verity Hunt is murdered, as is Nora Broad, and that is why Michael is in jail (gaol). If you have the book at hand, the draft of a Character List I just put up could use some improvements. I do not like to add to the article every specific without the book at hand. --Prairieplant (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC) --Prairieplant (talk) 17:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- I added some sentences and descriptions of characters with the book in hand. Hope that you can follow the story now. There is a character list now, for double checking. The summary is longer; maybe another editor can do a better job. --Prairieplant (talk) 00:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
How many tourists are on the tour bus with Miss Marple?
The article says there are 14 others in the tour besides Miss Marple (and, of course, the tour guide, Mrs. Sandbourne.) I'm reading the book now and (so far) Agatha hasn't stated that number. But the passenger list that Miss Marple studies, lists 15:
- 1. Mrs. Ridley-Porter
- 2. Miss Joanna Crawford
- 3 & 4. Colonel and Mrs. Walker
- 5 & 6. Mr. and Mrs. L. T. Butler
- 7. Miss Elizabeth Temple
- 8. Professor Wanstead
- 9. Mr. Richard Jameson
- 10. Miss Lumley
- 11. Miss Bentham
- 12. Mr. Casper
- 13. Miss Cooke
- 14. Miss Barrow
- 15. Mr. Emlyn Price
(This list is copied as it is in the book, with my numbers added.)
I suggest that the article should be revised to change fourteen to fifteen (in 3 places), or to not state the number at all.