Jump to content

Talk:Naval Battle of Campeche

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in Naval Battle of Campeche

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Naval Battle of Campeche's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Handbook of Texas":

  • From Texan brig Wharton: Cutrer, Thomas. "Wharton". Handbook of Texas Online. Texas State Historical Association. Retrieved 2007-11-24.
  • From Texan sloop-of-war Austin: "Austin". Handbook of Texas Online. Texas State Historical Association. Retrieved 2007-11-02.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 08:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naval Battle of Campeche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strategic victory for which side?

[edit]

The Wikipedia entry for the Texas Navy calls this battle "a tactical draw, but a strategic victory for the Texan Navy" while here it is called a strategic victory for the Mexican side. Tupelo the typo fixer (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote the second claim. But I have no reference. Sorry to make that up.
In my defense, the Battle was result of Naval Blockade of Campeche. So, Federal Mexican objective was to keep the blockade and Texan-Yucatecan objective was to relieve them. With Mexican Navy withdrawn and naval blockade lifted, I think that constitute in 'strategic victory'. Kindlydude (talk) 08:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to necro but the closest thing to what I wrote is "a Texian-Yucatecan tactical draw; a strategic victory." What I mean is "a Texian-Yucatecan tactical draw; a [Texian-Yucatecan(, not Mexican)] strategic victory."
It seems I wrote it badly. You misunderstood what I mean, And I misred your complain. Kindlydude (talk) 08:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]