Jump to content

Talk:Nationally recognized statistical rating organization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Capitalization

[edit]

So it seems that the SEC is not consistent in capitalizing "nationally recognized statistical rating organization".

This SEC study] (see page 5) does not capitalize the term when spelled out, while the website does.

What is more important, however, is that the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, which is what Wikipedia articles generally follow, says here:

A proper noun or proper name is a noun representing unique entities (such as London, Jupiter, Larry, or Toyota), as distinguished from common nouns which describe a class of entities (such as city, planet, person or car).

The Wikipedia Manual follow The McGraw-Hill Handbook of English Grammar and Usage, which is a pretty standard reference.

Also, in changing the capitalization back to capitalization that is not consistent with WP:MOS, User:Epstein's Mother also undid the following other edits that I had made:

The SEC report you cite to is from 2002. In 2006, Congress passed the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act, which defined the term. Since that time, you will notice that most references by the SEC to "Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations" use capitals. It's like "NASA" -- unless Wikipedia puts it as "National aeronautics and space administration," the words underlying "NRSRO" should be capitalized. Therefore, these changes should be reverted, as well as the page itself. Epstein's Mother (talk) 03:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm restoring my changes. Ground Zero | t 02:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia style manual you cite to uses capitals in abbreviations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Abbreviations Epstein's Mother (talk) 03:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
NASA is a unique entity, NRSROs are not unique entities - there are several of them. A common noun is not capitalized just because an acronym is made of the name. See these examples:

Ground Zero | t 13:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"NRSRO" is not a "common noun," but a legal term. Like "Qualified Institutional Buyer" or "Consolidated Supervised Entity." Epstein's Mother (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]
I cannot find in WP:MOS an exception for legally defined terms. The description "common nouns which describe a class of entities" still applies. NRSROs are a class of entities, not a unique entity. Ground Zero | t 17:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC),[reply]
The term as used in this article describes a status, called Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization, as defined by one country's government. Unless the article is rewritten to be about that status (or similar) worldwide the title should be capitalised. Peter James (talk) 20:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Nationally recognized statistical rating organization's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceA":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add Demotech

[edit]

Please add Demotech, Inc. as tenth nrsro, effective 7/11/2022. 2600:1009:B02A:E7D7:847E:5EA6:9F82:A17B (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Bloodline12 (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]