Talk:List of all-time NFL win–loss records

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Football League High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yes,I Am agree regarding Cleveland Browns started a new franchise in 1999 but Cleveland Browns keep all the records from 1946 until now. Baltimore Colts start in 1953 and the Indianapolis Colts keep all the Baltimore Colts records until now. Baltimore ravens were a new franchise and their records begains in 1996. There is no doubt at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.178.173.132 (talk) 20:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well if someone is interested league AAFC.From 1946-1949 San Francisco 49´s W 38, L14, & T 2 = 54 Games. Cleveland Browns W 47 L 4 T 3 =54 Games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.178.173.132 (talk) 22:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Records are wrong. If the lndinapolis Colts first season is considered 1953, then the Baltimore Ravins first season should be 1950, which is what is listed for the Cleavland Browns. But the Baltimore Ravins were the Cleveland Browns, just like the Indinapolis Colts where the Baltimore Colts. Cleveland did not have a team for three (3) seasons. The way the whole thing was worked out legaly, as best I can tell, the Ravins where a NEW franchise in 1996, and the Browns of today where an expansion team of 1999, with the City of Cleveland holding the rights to the name Cleveland Browns. They are a new franchise as of 1999. The Ravins are a new franchise as of 1996. 2601:145:600:3A29:655E:1D1:F02D:ED8E (talk) 08:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accurate playoff records

The record of each teams' playoff history should be updated for each team so that it is accurate through Super Bowl 51.Joshuaharalson (talk) 19:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are those NFL Records Correct?

According to the info you are showing on NFL win-loss records Steelers show 601 win ,535 loss,20 tied and Eagles show 555 win,591 loss,26 tied but if you remember in 1943 Steelers and Eagles were the same team called Phi/Pit Eagles/Steelers and their record were 5 win,4 loss, 1 tied. And my Question is In what team are you taked or count it those 5 won, 4 losses,1 tied ? The same cituation happened in 1944 Chicago Cardenals(Arizona Cardenals) and Steelers were the same team called Chi/Pit Cards/Steelers and the record were 10 games lost

Are you counted those 10 on Steelers and or with Arizana Cardenals?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.162.253.171 (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Win Pct - how is it calculated?

The column Win Percentage for both the Regular Season and Combined (Regular Season + Playoffs) tables seems to be incorrect.

Currently, the Regular Season tables shows: Cowboys, 512 wins / 898 played / 0.573 Win Pct. But 512/898 = .570 Bears, 761 / 1386 / .564, But 761/1386 = 0.549. etc.

If the Ties are included as Wins, the % still doesn't match up.

Is the Win Pct. column automatically calculated based on previous columns, like a spreadsheet? Or are these values entered manually? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zonker.in.geneva (talk • contribs) 15:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ties are counted as half-wins. If a team goes 9-6-1 in a season, for example, that would be calculated as 9.5/16. Soulbust (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regular season additional statistic

I think it would be good to add Conference Titles (CT), Division Titles (DT), Most Wins in a Season (meaning number of season where the team had the highest number of wins in the whole league) and Losing Seasons (meaning number of seasons where the team had more loses than wins; so for example 7-7-2 is not a losing season) columns. The latter two show whether teams rely on good generations or there is some sistematic good work. Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 19:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Play off additional statistic

I think it would be good to add number of appearances in po (App), SB Wins and SB Finals columns. Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chiefs

I changed the Chiefs records to take one game and one loss off the regular season and put them on to the combined record. The previous numbers didn't correctly add up such that regular season + playoffs = combined record, and gave them one more regular season game in their history than all the other AFL charter franchises. It seems that the most recent Super Bowl was added to the regular season record instead of the combined record in this edit: [1]. The new totals (495-425-12 regular season and 510-445-12 combined) tally with Pro Football Reference [2]. --rbrwr ^± 19:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All win % are wrong

All of the team win percentage numbers are wrong. Ties do count as games but don't count as wins. 2601:8C:501:2AE0:C7E1:462E:EE7:FC1 (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ties are not counted as wins in this list, but as half-wins when calculating the win-loss percentage. I did look further into this because I was confused why the math wouldn't follow through on counting all ties as half-wins when calculating this win-loss percentage as per the standings seen at PFR. The NFL does actually officially count ties as half-wins but any ties prior to 1972 are actually not counted (source here [3]). So I'll be fixing that up in this article soon. Soulbust (talk) 00:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current layout with counted ties in parenthesis and non-counted (pre-1972) ties not in parenthesis is somewhat counterintuitive. I would suggest reversing the two so that the games which are counted (post-1971) are not in parenthesis, to match how the wins and losses (which are all counted) are not in parenthesis. .אבי נ (talk) 16:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]