Talk:Atheniella flavoalba/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article! Two issues:

In Taxonomy; sentence "American mycologist Rolf Singer transferred the species to the genera Hemimycena and Marasmiellus in 1938 and 1951, respectively, but the binomials resulting from these transfers are considered synonyms;"..

Are they synonymous merely because the genera are, or the because the binomials are associated with this species?

Have clarified with a cuppa-pasta about Singer's taxonomic shenanigans from another article. Sasata (talk) 01:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Description; there is a contradiction. The sentence reads "Although edible, it is considered "not worthwhile"."; the source says "inedible"; the mycomorphbox says edibility "unknown". :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good thing you're checking these for me :) There's disadvantages to writing a dozen similar articles at the same time! Inedible. Sasata (talk) 01:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good fixes! Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Mycena flavoalba passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass