Talk:Murasaki Shikibu Nikki Emaki/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 11:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Should "The Murasaki Shikibu Diary Emaki" be italicized?--Tomcat (7) 13:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I put "Murasaki Shikibu Diary Emaki" in italics per your suggestion and per WP:MOS which says: "Use italics for the titles of works of literature and art..." bamse (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]