Talk:Mukesh (actor)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).

mukesh's first film Balloon came out in 1982. its not in late 1970's. pls correct the same.

Thank you for the correction.

Fair use rationale for Image:Mukessh.jpg

Image:Mukessh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Godfather.jpg

Image:Godfather.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 18:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh (Malayalam actor) → Mukesh (actor) — Relisted for further discussion. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 02:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- [The word Malayalam is unnecessary as there is only one actor by the name Mukesh.] --Salih (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — There is another actor with a similar name: Mukesh Khanna. See Mukesh. --Una Smith (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was aware of the Hindi film actor Mukesh Khanna. He is invariably referred to as "Mukesh Khanna" not simply Mukesh and, at present, there is no other notable Mukesh Khanna exists. So the title of his page is perfectly alright. The problem is with people known simply by their name Mukesh. In this category there are two notable people at present; the Hindi film singer Mukesh and the Malayalam film actor Mukesh. Appropriately, the Hindi singer's page-title is given as Mukesh (singer) and on the same line, the Malayalam actor's page-title could be Mukesh (actor). Salih (talk) 06:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a case of "not broken, don't fix". --Una Smith (talk) 14:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mukesh (actor) is already a redirect to Mukesh (Malayalam actor). I just suggest that the word Malayalam can be dropped by moving Mukesh (Malayalam actor) to Mukesh (actor). Salih (talk) 17:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support "Malayalam" is needlessly burdensome as no other mononymous Mukesh exists and the proposed title already redirects here. Hekerui (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mukesh (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article name change discussion

The title of article is a spelling mistake + the previous name was apt as the article of actor whose name is Mukesh. Can someone explain why the change was made?

Thanks, Aadirulez8 (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted this per a request at WP:RM/TR. It looks like another editor moved it and then an admin removed the disambiguator. We can open a move request per WP:RM if anybody wants to move it again, that would be preferable to discussing here. (Also noting that this is a return to the consensus found in the move discussion above, even if the participation was a bit limited)

Also, while I'm here, I might suggest that we split his filmography into a list article, it's very long. ASUKITE 14:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]