Talk:Mount Caburn

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Article Image

I propose changing the lead picture on this article - although the current image (File:Caburn Fort - geograph.org.uk - 135099.jpg) shows the Iron Age ramparts well it does not show the outline of the hill very clearly. I therefore suggest that this image be moved down to the Enclosure section of the article and replaced as the lead picture by another photograph, perhaps File:Comp Farm - geograph.org.uk - 971530.jpg or File:Mount Caburn - geograph.org.uk - 1199824.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilbert de Clare (talk • contribs) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 Feb 2021: Did not get any response, so went ahead with change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilbert de Clare (talk • contribs) 14:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]