Talk:Moss Side, South Ribble

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I propose that this page be moved to Moss Side, Lancashire, in line with other Lancashire villages such as Anderton, Lancashire, Banks, Lancashire, Overton, Lancashire and Rufford, Lancashire - at the moment it's the only village in Lancashire using its parliamentary constituency as its marker. Any thoughts? Aquilina 10:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No thoughts, it would appear. As there's been no dissenting voices, and the move is in line with WP naming conventions, I'm going to move the article now, and edit the corresponding redirects accordingly. If there's any problems with this move, direct them to User_talk:Aquilina. A q uilina 13:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The title of this article could lead to confusion with the hamlet where Moss Side railway station is located, also in Lancashire between Wrea Green and Lytham. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 02:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC) I've added a hatnote to distinguish the two. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 03:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. - GTBacchus^(talk) 08:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moss Side, Lancashire → Moss Side, South Ribble —

The well known Moss Side (in Greater Manchester) was in Lancashire
Brown Moss Side is the location of Moss Side railway station
There is also a Moss Side near Pilling

. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 22:15, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:UKPLACE. County is the correct dab as per the previous move discussion above. Nancy ^talk 06:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, probably; the county dab may be correct, but Crouch Swale has a point; there are at least three Moss Sides in Lancashire, so leaving the dab at county level isn't sufficient. Swanny18 (talk) 18:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, support - UKPLACE obviously doesn't say that we use the county as a disambiguator if it wouldn't be sufficient to disambiguate, as seems to be the case here.--Kotniski (talk) 11:20, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moss Side, South Ribble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070903182501/http://www.prestoncitizen.co.uk/your/mossside/ to http://www.prestoncitizen.co.uk/your/mossside/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure who's responsible for this page, but the link mentioned here hasn't been updated since 2007. As its referred to in the entry as the "New" community site it seems like the definition of new is being stretched quite a bit. 😁 Efan78 (talk) 03:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]