Jump to content

Talk:Monmouth School for Boys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Monmouth School)
Good articleMonmouth School for Boys has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 23, 2008Articles for deletionKept
March 12, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Frank Owen

[edit]
  • Weak source [1]

KJP1 (talk) 03:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Tucker (businessman)

[edit]

I've added him, although there's currently no article. He's notable, partly on his own account, perhaps more as the life partner of A. E. Dyson. I'll do a Start class shortly, but if any editors have further information, that would be helpful. Tony Dyson is much better documented. KJP1 (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. Note to self, already exists as Cliff Tucker (executive), a redirect to Dyson. KJP1 (talk) 16:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updating

[edit]

This, and Haberdashers' Monmouth School for Girls, need updating to reflect the Autumn 2024 amalgamation, [2][3]. We now have one institution, Haberdashers' Monmouth School. Do we want a new article, under that title, and these left as “historical” articles on the old schools? Or one article, incorporating material from the existing articles, that covers all of it? Thoughts welcome. KJP1 (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a temporary fix, I've tweaked the leads and the History sections of this and of the Haberdashers' Monmouth School for Girls articles, to reflect the current position. But there are things that don't quite work, e.g. they both carry their historical single-sex status under Gender in the Infoboxes, when they are now co-ed. But it seems a bit weird to so describe them when the articles are titled Monmouth School for Boys/Girls respectively? They both need more work. But a decision is needed on whether we keep these articles and start a new one for the new institution, or do one new article to cover all three. KJP1 (talk) 08:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]