Talk:Fantastic Four: World's Greatest Heroes

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Animation: European Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the European animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Marvel Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

New Season?

Any info about a new season or new episodes? Its been a very long time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.163.72.150 (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rework Episode Table

The table of episodes needs a lot of work... The left side looks ugly and I bet the prose needs work also.--Htmlism 19:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The overview for the episodes can definitely use some work, they are more like complete synopses at this point than just an overview.--Electricbolt 18:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere along the line, the episode "Revenge of the Skrulls" (episode 12?) disappeared from the episode table.70.49.22.13 02:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings, fan reaction?

Anyone have any numbers how well this show is performing? Has it been favorably received by FF fans? (my 2¢ is that it's skewed young like Ultimate FF, and the Thing's costume is terrible.) --68.103.154.140 10:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC) I haven't seen it, but sure would like to. I guess that says something, Im a big Marvel fan and I didn't even know about it. So maybe the show has a lack of advertising or something, cause I figure I would at least see an ad in a comic or something. But no I never heard of it before today. Bhold1 23:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know this isn't a discussion board, and your comment is ten years old, but nothing's happening here anyway, so: My two cents is that the UFF comic wasn't really skewed towards younger readers. The characters themselves were made younger, but the writing was as intelligent as you could ask for. The UFF version of their origin was certainly explained a lot more science-fictionally than "We got hit with cosmic rays and they made us weird!" It gets a bad rap, but it was a good comic for a time. Oh, well. Useless comment, sorry.

I thought this series was pretty good, and with a stable airing schedule it might have succeeded. --Ben Culture (talk) 09:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To do

screenshots with valid fair use justifications.
Move the current summaries to a season page or individual episode pages and replace them with 2-3 sentence short summaries, linking the title to the correct page.
- Made the first episode page, but the tables summary needs to be shortened. - Peregrinefisher 05:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peregrinefisher 02:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation Confirmed

Over in the She-Hulk article, there is confirmation (a citation) that the show will be continuing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.131.145.64 (talk) 11:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC).{{subst:image source|Image:2006ff.jpg)) Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC) {{missing rationale2|Image:2006ff.jpg[reply]

World's Greatest Heroes

Shouldn't the title of this article be Fantastic Four: World's Greatest Heroes - as this is the title of the series, rather than simply "Fantastic Four"? MultipleTom 14:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Since no one disputed it when you brought it up, I'm going to go ahead and move it. -Joltman 15:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Fantastic Four World Greatest Heroes Volume 1.jpg

Image:The Fantastic Four World Greatest Heroes Volume 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fantastic-four-20060829101843035.jpg

Image:Fantastic-four-20060829101843035.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fantastic-four-20060829101843035.jpg

Image:Fantastic-four-20060829101843035.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airdates?

Where did the airdates came from for the episodes after Strings? I know they didn't air on Cartoon Network, were they from international airings? -Joltman (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have never seen it on CN. 76.126.15.78 (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Animation

There is no mention of this series having been produced by Marvel Animation on this page, yet it is included on the Marvel Animation template. Was this series affiliated with Marvel Animation or not?--60.228.14.89 (talk) 01:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fantastic Four: World's Greatest Heroes. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://marvel.toonzone.net/news.php?action=fullnews&id=327

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fantastic Four: World's Greatest Heroes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929111041/http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic%3Bf%3D36%3Bt%3D005524 to http://www.comicon.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic%3Bf%3D36%3Bt%3D005524

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]