Talk:2014 Moldovan parliamentary election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Moldova

	Moldova portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

election date NOT set yet

The link provided a statement by PARTY LEADER (not the Electoral Commission) stating 30 November would be the proper day, but this doesn't mean the date has been officialy set yet.

Polls errors

The table with the polls results have different poll results than the articles attributed as sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.24.40.160 (talk) 08:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? Number 5 7 08:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CEC figures

The figures from the CEC (here appear to have a few inconsistencies.

The total number of valid votes (give at the bottom) matches the party totals. However, the number of total votes cast (1,416,716) is less than the number of valid and invalid votes added together (1,380,104 + 63,511 = 1,443,615).

Perhaps this is because the results aren't finalised yet, but something doesn't seem right! Number 5 7 12:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now we have the final results, this inconsistency remains:

Total valid votes is 1,598,514 (this matches the party totals)
Total invalid votes is 54,891

This should give a total of 1,653,405, yet the figure given by the CEC is 1,647,207. Does anyone know what the difference is? Number 5[[Special:Contributions/Number

57|7]] 17:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Regarding unsourced sector "Campaign"

The stuff presently placed under "Campaign" is from Russian wiki, I did not use the Russian sources, because I reckoned it was of little use to Anglophones and its all uncontroversial evaluations, but it has been tagged, so should we copy the Russian sources or just wait for someone with the time to find sources in English?--Batmacumba (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova

This article refers to the PSRM as a new party. That's obviously not the case. Charles Essie (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, they ran on the Communists list in 2010, but where reestablished i 2011 and never formally dissolved. I have replaced it with "small rival" Russophile party. Radical would be a usefull qualifier, but I do not know if people will delete that.--Batmacumba (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moldovan parliamentary election, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]