Talk:Mohawk Airlines Flight 411

Mohawk Airlines Flight 411 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 16, 2006	Articles for deletion	Kept
October 7, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
December 14, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
	This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

GA failed

1. Well written? Fail

2. Factually accurate? Fail

3. Broad in coverage? Fail

4. Neutral point of view? Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images? Pass

Additional comments :

The lead section doesn't summarize the article it brings more information.
No inline citations and poorly referenced.
Not broad enough.
Nothing about the flight (depature, when was the landing scheduled, length of the trip)

Lincher 01:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA re-review / promoted

1. Well written? Pass

2. Factually accurate? Pass

3. Broad in coverage? Pass

4. Neutral point of view? Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images? Pass

Great work on re-ordering the stuff, adding material and cutting the extra from the lead section. The only thing that could be added would be to expand the lead section to talk about the investigation just in 1 line or 2. Nice work. Lincher 01:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]