Talk:Mohan Lal Kashmiri

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Why Zutshi?

Mohan Lal has almost always been referred to as "Mohan Lal". Sometimes, he was called "Mohan Lal Kashmiri". True that he was a Zutshi. To be precise, his gotar was Utra Bhag. But no one -- to my knowledge -- calls him Mohan Lal Zutshi.

IJ. --202.5.137.17 19:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Why Zutshi?

As far as his publications are concerned, Mohan Lal used neither Kashmiri or Zuthsi as part of his name. However, Hari Ram Gupta's authoritative biography of Mohan Lal refers to him 'Kashmiri' in the title. But I have yet to come across Zutshi as part of his name.

--Bztemp (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In the absence of anyone disagreeing, I will change the article to refer to Mohan Lal, as this is what he is called in most sources.

Physics is all gnomes (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books

I first learnt of Mohan Lal in John H. Waller's "Beyond the Khyber Pass" (1990), a telling of the disaster of the First Afghan War. From my recollection of that read I found Mr. Waller's assessment of Mohan Lal to be very generous. Perhaps the author of this article could see if this book is worth citing as a very readable reference.98.115.177.80 (talk) 02:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]