Jump to content

Talk:Minerva (Internet celebrity)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Minerva (Agora ID))

why should that be deleted?

[edit]

explain please specifically.--Ilovesabbath (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

that person is famous in s.korea. let me explain some reason.
  1. economic expectations which is more believable than the gov.
  2. his criticism on economic policies of the gov.
  3. freedom of expressions

so that person has made many issues in s.korea. if contents is too short and miscellanious, that's because my english and writing is poor, not this subject important.--Ilovesabbath (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and korean wikipedia also debated about deleting it(ko:위키백과:삭제 토론/아고라 미네르바) korean wiki decided to maintain this article. the reason is that this person is frequently reported by all korean news. i don't think this article will be nothing to english-using people.--Ilovesabbath (talk) 08:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
there're news links.

--Ilovesabbath (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a blurb about him in a recent issue of The Economist. That's notable enough. 144.89.186.134 (talk) 06:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Give it a different title?

[edit]

I know he is mentioned often by Korean media and some non-Korean presses mentions recent events on him. Anyway, apart from notability, "(Agora ID)" sounds like Konglish. So what about "(Daum Agora user)", using proper English words and confirming Agora of where?

인터넷 논객이 이렇게 엄청난 주목을 받고, 그 사람이 구속되어 전국이 들끓을 정도로 대한민국 내에서 미네르바 소식을 내놓지 않는 곳 없고, 몇몇 외신도 주목하는 건 알겠습니다만, 이 문서의 중요도와 상관없이 "Minerva" 뒤에 붙은 "(Agora ID)"는 왠지 콩글리시처럼 느껴집니다. "(Agora ID)" 대신에 "(Daum Agora user)"를 붙여서 "무슨 아고라에서 뭐하는 사람"인지 확실히 할 필요가 있겠습니다.

JSH-alive talkcontmail 11:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. ID could be replaced with "username" or "name used on bulletin board". For now, Minerva (Agora user) may do.

i agree, too. 아이디도 콩글리시였군요.--Ilovesabbath (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Style

[edit]

We need to leave some notes on the style of the article. Fortunately, there has been some cosmetic touch, but the article is still badly structured (IMHO). The same goes for the Japanese Minerva article.

1. Someone needs to restructure the chronology of events, major events, debates, etc. so some of us can fill them in.

2. We need to elaborate on his famous postings and the controversy surrounding his identity.

The Suspect's Identity

[edit]

At this time, it does not seem desirable to specify the suspect's name. We do not know if he is the man behind all unless it is proven in court.

Someone has just added his announced real name (by the prosecutors); shall we remove this for now? He is still waiting for a trial.

Minerva's real name is already spread thru media, and also, he declared that he will use his real name instead of 'Minerva'. And I announce that the first trial gave him a decision of 'not guilty', and the prosecutors decided to bring an appeal. adidas (talk) 16:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sarah Austin (Internet personality) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minerva (Internet celebrity). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]