Jump to content

Talk:Millennium season 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Millennium (season 3))
Good articleMillennium season 3 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 5, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 27, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the third season of Millennium sought to reduce its central conflicts to a struggle between two friends?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Millennium (season 3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 15:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Infobox: Picture, maybe? Not needed, but it would look nice. :)
    Added. Does look good. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Infobox: DVD release?
    Added region one, it's mentioned in the DVD Talk source if you want it cited. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intro: "...concluding" -> "and concluded"
    Done. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intro: "organisation" -> "organization" just to Americanize it
    Good catch. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intro: "but after the Group unleashes a virus that resulted in the death of Black's wife, he leaves." Should this be in past or present tense? Didn't the virus get released at the end of season two?
    Reworded. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intro: emdash after "Johannessen"
    Left as is; that last bit about writing is intended to be part of the same aside, and wouldn't work if it's not kept with the names. It's "two new producers (X and Y, who wrote too)" rather than "two new producers who also wrote (X and Y)", which a second dash would essentially make it. I'm confusing myself here. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intro: "generally positive reviews from critics" I thought this season was pretty trashed by people, or is that just the fan opinion?
    Fan opinion definitely holds it as the weakest season but that's usually hinged on how poorly Hollis was received; the sources indicate a higher opinion of it but if more reviews turn up I can always change this bit. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: "they wanted" Maybe "the writers wanted"
    Added. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: I think "with" should be added to the end of the last sentence of the first paragraphs
    Having a brain fart here, not sure where you want it added. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: I would add a citation after every direct quote.
    Think I've got this, let me know if I've missed any. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Out of curiosity, are there any ratings numbers?
    Could probably turn some up (they're patchy for season 2 though but I can have a look). What would you want done with them? I'm unlikely to be able to find a complete record though so an average would be inaccurate. GRAPPLE X 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a big deal. Maybe just premiere and finale ratings. That kind of stuff. Maybe how it finished in the Nielsen ratings.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for having a look at this one for me. 23:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
All the concerns were fixed or addressed, so I will pass this! Good job!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Millennium (season 3). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Millennium (season 3). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]