Talk:Middle Rocks

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Middle Rocks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Middle Rocks be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Name

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The consensus was that the article should be renamed from "Middle Rocks, Johor" to "Middle Rocks".

I wonder whether this article should be named Batuan Tengah or Middle Rocks. Any comment? __earth ^(Talk) 13:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English).--Huaiwei (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the name "Middle Rocks, Johor"? There is no other article called "Middle Rocks". — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 17:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am formally proposing that this article be renamed from "Middle Rocks, Johor" to "Middle Rocks". I feel adding "Johor" to the article name is unnecessary as there is no other article named "Middle Rocks", nor does there appear to be such a place anywhere else in the world. Do weigh in with your comments so that consensus can be reached on the issue. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 09:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Jpatokal (talk) 13:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes with Middle Rocks. ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 14:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. Chensiyuan (talk) 15:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. With no other "Middle Rocks" article, the disambiguation is not necessary.--Huaiwei (talk) 15:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is at least one other Middle Rocks, see http://www.thecrag.com/CRAGS/MiddleRocks-262996.html for some information, but clearly less notable than this one IMO. Andrewa (talk) 09:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. ukexpat (talk) 19:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Rocks, Johor, Malaysia → Middle Rocks — Very recent bad move to the current title. There is no need to disambiguate this page, and per Wikipedia:Article titles it should not be this precise, and it should be concise. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Oppose. "Middle Rocks" alone is too indefinite a name: there are many rocks which are in the middle of things. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How many of them are called "Middle Rocks"? It's the proper name of the rocks in question, even in international forums. This is the ICJ case. I googled "Middle Rocks", and only got hits for these rocks. Yes it's a bad name, but so is North Sea. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per previous discussion. There is only one article on "Middle Rocks" on wikipedia, so there is no need to disambiguate. I didnt see this discussion earlier so i went ahead to make a move request here: Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Current_requests. I thought it was an uncontroversial move request because this page was moved without any discussion and because I thought the guidelines are clear. Maybe I should retract that request? ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 16:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't know that you had. I didn't list it as speedy because someone had moved it, and I'm not sure a revert is considered speedy. Not sure what the procedure is, maybe note another editor opened an RM? Apologies again. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Middle Rocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]