Talk:Midas (Shelley play)/GA1

GA Review

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of July 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Understandable and clear use of language.

2. Factually accurate?: Good use of notes/bibliography.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers multiple different aspects of the work, broken up into subsections Background, Writing and publication, Plot summary, Genre, Style and themes, and Reception.

4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutral manner.

5. Article stability? Stable since May 2008 creation, no issues in article history or on talk page.

6. Images?: All images used are on Wikimedia Commons, no issues here.

Excellent work, well done yet again by Awadewit (talk · contribs) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 05:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)